top of page

The Dark Scales of Justice Exploring Balance Corruption and the Call for Accountability

First of all thank you to the thousands of readers that have downloaded Dark Scales of Justice on Kindle. You make my heart soar with happiness. I apologize that some necessary changes had to be made to enhance the story and remove any information that may have affected your ability to enjoy the story of Jennifer Campbell. Suffice it to say, my original editors and publishers are no longer working with me. If you have purchased the Kindle version please reupload to receive the most up to date Kindle and Audiobook. Without your support and kindness I wouldn't be writing and sharing my stories. Thank you!


Justice is often symbolized by a pair of scales, balanced and impartial, representing fairness and equality. This image is deeply ingrained in our collective consciousness, suggesting that justice weighs all sides equally before delivering a verdict. Yet, history and current events reveal a more complicated reality. The scales of justice can tilt, sometimes subtly, sometimes drastically, revealing a darker side where fairness is compromised, and corruption seeps in. This post explores the symbolism of the scales, examines instances where justice has been skewed, and reflects on the consequences of these injustices, especially for marginalized communities. It also invites readers to consider what true justice means and why accountability matters.


Today in the United States there are many instances that appear to be unfair and unjust. The American people deserve a system that is fair and balanced. With those in charge of the country ensuring this balance is maintained. Sadly, this author believes that the scales have been tipped again and the unfair seems to be growing exponentially.


The Symbolism of the Scales in Justice


The scales have been a powerful symbol of justice since ancient times. They represent balance, impartiality, and the weighing of evidence before making a decision. The idea is simple: justice should be blind to bias, weighing facts and truth equally for everyone.


  • Balance: The scales suggest that every argument, every piece of evidence, should be given equal consideration.

  • Impartiality: Justice should not favor one side over another due to power, wealth, or status.

  • Accountability: The scales remind us that decisions must be measured and fair, holding individuals and institutions responsible.


This symbolism sets a high standard. It demands that justice systems operate without prejudice and corruption. Yet, the reality often falls short.


Historical Examples of Skewed Justice


Throughout history, the scales of justice have frequently tipped in favor of the powerful, leaving many without fair treatment.


Slavery and Segregation in the United States


For centuries, the legal system in the United States upheld slavery and later segregation laws that denied basic rights to Black Americans. Courts often sided with laws that institutionalized racial discrimination, showing a clear imbalance in justice.


  • The Dred Scott decision (1857) declared that African Americans could not be citizens, denying them legal protection.

  • Jim Crow laws enforced racial segregation well into the 20th century, supported by courts that ignored the principle of equality.


These examples show how justice was corrupted to maintain social hierarchies and suppress marginalized groups.


Apartheid in South Africa


From 1948 to the early 1990s, South Africa’s apartheid regime legally enforced racial segregation and discrimination. The justice system was a tool to uphold this system, punishing those who opposed it while protecting the interests of the white minority.


  • Laws criminalized political dissent and activism.

  • Courts often ignored abuses by the state, denying justice to the majority population.


This period highlights how justice can be weaponized to sustain oppression.


Contemporary Examples of Corrupted Justice


Justice systems today still face challenges that cause the scales to tip unfairly.


Racial Bias in Policing and Sentencing


Studies show that racial minorities, particularly Black and Indigenous people, face disproportionate rates of arrest, harsher sentencing, and police violence in many countries.


  • In the United States, Black Americans are incarcerated at more than five times the rate of white Americans.

  • Indigenous peoples in Canada and Australia experience similar disparities in their justice systems.


These imbalances reflect systemic bias and undermine the ideal of equal justice.


Economic Inequality and Access to Justice


Justice often depends on resources. Wealthy individuals and corporations can afford better legal representation, influencing outcomes in their favor.


  • Poor defendants may rely on overburdened public defenders.

  • Civil cases involving marginalized groups often face barriers due to cost and complexity.


This economic divide skews justice, favoring those with means.


Eye-level view of a tilted brass scale of justice on a dark wooden table
The tilted scales symbolize imbalance and corruption in justice

.


The Impact of Injustice on Marginalized Communities


When justice is corrupted, the consequences extend beyond individual cases. Marginalized communities suffer systemic harm.


  • Erosion of trust: When courts and law enforcement are seen as unfair, communities lose faith in the system.

  • Social exclusion: Unfair legal outcomes can reinforce poverty, limit opportunities, and deepen inequality.

  • Psychological harm: Experiencing injustice causes trauma and a sense of powerlessness.


For example, wrongful convictions disproportionately affect minority groups, leading to lost years and shattered lives. These injustices perpetuate cycles of disadvantage.


Reflecting on the True Meaning of Justice


Justice is more than legal procedures or court rulings. It is a commitment to fairness, dignity, and respect for all people. True justice requires:


  • Transparency: Open processes that allow scrutiny and prevent abuse.

  • Accountability: Holding individuals and institutions responsible for misconduct.

  • Equity: Recognizing and addressing systemic barriers that affect marginalized groups.


Justice must be active, not passive. It demands constant vigilance to ensure the scales remain balanced.


The Call for Accountability


Accountability is essential to restore trust and fairness in justice systems. This means:


  • Investigating and addressing corruption and bias.

  • Reforming laws and practices that perpetuate inequality.

  • Empowering communities to participate in justice processes.


Efforts like independent oversight bodies, legal aid programs, and community policing models show promise in making justice more accessible and fair.




© 2025 by Michaela Riley. Powered and secured by Wix
bottom of page